Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718865›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2025

Understanding oncological and sexual function outcomes with gynaecological organ preserving cystectomy in women with bladder cancer; a systematic review.

Rebecca Martin, Harriet Wylie, Charlotte Moss, Shaista Hafeez, Pardeep Kumar, Anne Marie Rafferty, Mieke Van Hemelrijck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca MartinKing's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-1327
Harriet WylieKing's College London London UK.
Charlotte MossKing's College London London UK.
Shaista HafeezThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Pardeep KumarThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Anne Marie RaffertyKing's College London London UK.
Mieke Van HemelrijckKing's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-0858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives: Cystectomy for bladder cancer (BC) in women involves removing gynaecological organs and the anterior vaginal wall, significantly impacting sexual function (SF). Gynaecological organ-preserving cystectomy (GOPC) aims to minimise toxicity, but limited studies assess its impact. We reviewed existing evidence. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using Ovid (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL) and Cochrane Library. Studies assessing survival and SF outcomes of GOPC and SF outcomes of standard cystectomy were included. Results: Fourteen studies (1049 screened) reported on small cohorts (11-41 patients). Most GOPC patients had ≤T2b N0 M0 disease, while standard cystectomy patients had up to T4/N1. In the GOPC cohort median follow-up was 36 months.Over a 16-70 month period, Disease-Free Survival in GOPC patients was 80-100%. Due to heterogeneity in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS), a narrative analysis was performed.GOPC patients reported high levels of sexual activity, reduced dyspareunia and moderate-to-high satisfaction. While SF initially declined, recovery improved over time, with Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores exceeding the 26.2 dysfunction threshold in two studies by 12 months.In standard cystectomy, sexual dysfunction was common, with varying distress levels and inadequate patient counselling. Conclusions: Understanding the outcomes of GOPC is limited by study design and measurement variability, and meta-analysis was not possible. In this narrative review, oncological outcomes in the GOPC group appears to have equivalent oncological outcomes to a standard radical cystectomy in carefully selected female patients. Sexual recovery outcomes in either complete or partial sexual organ preserving cystectomy appear to be better than a standard female radical cystectomy. Further prospective studies, particularly those involving nerve-sparing surgery, are needed. Women undergoing either standard cystectomy and GOPC commonly experience sexual dysfunction, and there is a need to improve pre- and post-operative counselling.

Indexed as

anterior exenterationbladder cancercystectomyorgan sparingsexual functionsexual recoverysexual rehabilitationurothelial cancerwomenwomens health

Identifiers

PMID40718865
PMCPMC12290019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.