Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718864›Full record

Article3 Biotech2025

Tooth shape and sex estimation: a 3D geometric morphometric landmark-based comparative analysis of artificial neural networks, support vector machines, and Random Forest models.

Srikant Natarajan, Junaid Ahmed, Ruban Sundarraj, Varenya Vinay, Shravan Shetty, Nidhin Philip Jose, Sharada Chowdappa, Sunitha Carnelio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Srikant NatarajanDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2686-0397
Junaid AhmedManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka India 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9419-0754
Ruban SundarrajDepartment of Software Technology, St Aloysius (DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY) Institute of Management and IT- (AIMIT), Beeri, Mangaluru, Kotekar 575022 India.ORCID 0000-0001-7653-5130
Varenya VinayDepartment of Software Technology, St Aloysius (DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY) Institute of Management and IT- (AIMIT), Beeri, Mangaluru, Kotekar 575022 India.ORCID 0009-0004-6752-3663
Shravan ShettyManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka India 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8204-7835
Nidhin Philip JoseManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka India 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4814-9432
Sharada ChowdappaPrivate Dental Researcher, Mangaluru, India.ORCID 0009-0003-5428-6200
Sunitha CarnelioManipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka India 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2789-3692

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the performance of three artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms-support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and Random Forest (RF)-in sex estimation using 3D geometric morphometric data derived from nine permanent tooth classes in 120 individuals (60 males, 60 females). Dental casts from 60 males and 60 females, aged 13-20 were digitized using a 3D scanner. Anatomic and geometric landmarks were identified on nine tooth types (maxillary/mandibular premolars and molars) via 3D Slicer software. Landmark coordinates underwent Procrustes superimposition and principal component analysis. Three AI models (ANN, SVM, RF) were trained on pre-processed landmark data, with performance evaluated using fivefold cross validation, accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC. RF outperformed SVM and ANN across all tooth types, achieving the highest accuracy (97.95% for mandibular second premolars) and balanced precision/recall (0.85-1.0). SVM showed moderate performance (70-88% accuracy), while ANN had the lowest metrics (58-70% accuracy). Maxillary first molars (95.83% accuracy) and mandibular second premolars (97.95%) exhibited the highest sexual dimorphism. RF demonstrated minimal sex bias, whereas ANN struggled with female classification (recall: 0.33-0.88 vs. males: 0.36-1.0). Feature analysis highlighted mandibular premolars as most dimorphic, with RF leveraging complex spatial relationships between landmarks effectively. Random Forest emerged as the most robust model for sex estimation using 3D dental landmarks, likely due to its ability to handle tabular data and high-dimensional feature spaces. Traditional machine learning models (RF, SVM) outperformed ANN, suggesting data set structure and feature engineering influence AI efficacy. These findings underscore AI's potential to enhance objectivity and accuracy in forensic odontology, particularly with geometric morphometric data. Future research should explore hybrid models combining AI strengths with traditional morphometrics for improved reliability.

Indexed as

3D geometric morphometricsDental landmarksForensic AnthropologyForensic odontologyMachine learningRandom Forest algorithmSex estimation

Identifiers

PMID40718864
PMCPMC12297115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.