Article3 Biotech2025
Tooth shape and sex estimation: a 3D geometric morphometric landmark-based comparative analysis of artificial neural networks, support vector machines, and Random Forest models.
Article in 3 Biotech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A narrative review of artificial intelligence in dental imaging: from dataset design to clinical translation.Oral radiology · 2026Review
- Beyond Linear Measurements: A Multidimensional Framework for Evaluating Sexual Dimorphism in Human Postcanine Tooth Size.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Modernizing Forensic Anthropology: A Data-driven Pipeline for Human Identification and Profiling.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Sex inference based on convolutional neural network analysis of fingerprint data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Forensic Odontology in the Digital Era: A Narrative Review of Current Methods and Emerging Trends.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the performance of three artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms-support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and Random Forest (RF)-in sex estimation using 3D geometric morphometric data derived from nine permanent tooth classes in 120 individuals (60 males, 60 females). Dental casts from 60 males and 60 females, aged 13-20 were digitized using a 3D scanner. Anatomic and geometric landmarks were identified on nine tooth types (maxillary/mandibular premolars and molars) via 3D Slicer software. Landmark coordinates underwent Procrustes superimposition and principal component analysis. Three AI models (ANN, SVM, RF) were trained on pre-processed landmark data, with performance evaluated using fivefold cross validation, accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC. RF outperformed SVM and ANN across all tooth types, achieving the highest accuracy (97.95% for mandibular second premolars) and balanced precision/recall (0.85-1.0). SVM showed moderate performance (70-88% accuracy), while ANN had the lowest metrics (58-70% accuracy). Maxillary first molars (95.83% accuracy) and mandibular second premolars (97.95%) exhibited the highest sexual dimorphism. RF demonstrated minimal sex bias, whereas ANN struggled with female classification (recall: 0.33-0.88 vs. males: 0.36-1.0). Feature analysis highlighted mandibular premolars as most dimorphic, with RF leveraging complex spatial relationships between landmarks effectively. Random Forest emerged as the most robust model for sex estimation using 3D dental landmarks, likely due to its ability to handle tabular data and high-dimensional feature spaces. Traditional machine learning models (RF, SVM) outperformed ANN, suggesting data set structure and feature engineering influence AI efficacy. These findings underscore AI's potential to enhance objectivity and accuracy in forensic odontology, particularly with geometric morphometric data. Future research should explore hybrid models combining AI strengths with traditional morphometrics for improved reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.