ReviewTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology
Infectious scleritis: a comprehensive narrative review of epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management strategies.
Review in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal effects of antibody-mediated immunity to pathogens on five ophthalmic diseases: a Mendelian randomization study.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Scleritis and associated systemic diseases: contribution of systemic examination, follow-up, and additional investigations.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to provide an update on infectious scleritis (IS). A comprehensive search was conducted using Google Scholar, Scopus, and PubMed. IS is a rare but critical condition that presents significant diagnostic challenges and often leads to poor visual outcomes. It accounts for approximately 5%-10% of scleritis cases and warrants significant attention due to its delayed diagnosis. Ocular surgery is the primary contributor to IS, accounting for a substantial proportion of cases ranging from 58% to 83%, followed by trauma contributing to approximately 10% of cases. IS can be caused by various microorganisms, including bacteria (86%-87%), fungi (11%-13%), viruses, and parasites. Conjunctival hyperemia is a prevalent manifestation in approximately 98% of IS cases, while scleral necrosis is observed in around 93% of cases. Distinguishing IS from inflammatory scleritis before initiating steroid treatment is crucial. Surgical debridement of infected tissue, accompanied by appropriate topical and systemic antibiotic therapy significantly improves treatment outcomes by removing infected tissue and reducing the infection burden. Early surgical intervention markedly increases the likelihood of preserving the eye globe in severe cases. Risk factors for poor visual outcomes include poor visual acuity at presentation, associated endophthalmitis, keratitis, fungal etiology, and medical therapy without surgical debridement. Early diagnosis of IS is crucial as the disease can progress rapidly and lead to vision loss. While bacterial infections are the most common etiology of IS, the prognosis is particularly poor in cases of fungal IS. Surgical interventions, when combined with appropriate medical treatment, improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.