ArticlePeerJ2025
West Nile Virus (
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laboratory Assessment of Wastewater as Surveillance Tool for West Nile Virus, United States.Emerging infectious diseases · 2026Article
- West Nile Virus: Epidemiology, Surveillance, and Prophylaxis with a Comparative Insight from Italy and Iran.Vaccines · 2026Review
- West Nile Virus (PeerJ · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: A targeted droplet digital reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) approach (ddRT-PCR) was used to measure WNV concentrations in wastewater retrospectively from five locations and in over 600 samples. Three of these locations were in communities with multiple confirmed WNV infections, while two were not. Samples were collected during periods corresponding to typical WNV seasonality (spring to fall). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was measured simultaneously to assess nucleic acid degradation during sample storage. Publicly available confirmed WNV case data were compiled from the California and Nebraska departments of public health and their weekly arboviral reports. Results: WNV RNA was detected in wastewater samples during periods of known viral circulation within a community. The adopted ddRT-PCR assay is highly specific and sensitive, and detections in wastewater solids correspond to the occurrence of cases in the season and location of sampling. WNV was detected in nine samples in three locations with known WNV clinical cases-wastewater positivity rates in these locations ranged from 3.3% to 13%. The results suggest that wastewater monitoring could serve as an effective complement to traditional surveillance methods, particularly for sentinel surveillance in locations which do not have extensive mosquito and clinical testing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.