Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718774›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Psychological distress and problematic internet use among language teachers: a latent profile analysis.

Zizheng Shen, Honggang Liu, I-Hua Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zizheng ShenSchool of Foreign Languages, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Honggang LiuSchool of Foreign Languages, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
I-Hua ChenChinese Academy of Education Big Data, Faculty of Education, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Given the limited attention to psychological distress (PD) and problematic internet use (PIU) among language teachers, the study tried to reveal the different PD profiles and their association with PIU. Methods: We first employed latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify the latent profiles within a cohort of language teachers in China and then utilized multivariate logistic regression analysis to explore the demographic characteristics associated with different PD profiles. After that, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to examine the relationships between PD and PIU. Results: The LPA identified three distinct latent profiles of PD: the moderate-to-severe PD profile, the mild PD profile, and the mentally healthy profile. The results of multivariate logistic regression indicated that male and experienced language teachers were more likely to experience severe PD. The results of one way ANOVA suggested that language teachers experiencing PD reported notably higher levels of PIU, with those in the moderate-to-severe PD group scoring particularly high in internet gaming disorder. Discussion: Results of this study indicate the close association between PD and PIU in language teachers. These findings underscore the critical need to address PD among language teachers and emphasize the importance of education and training aimed at promoting teachers' appropriate internet use. Breaking the "PD-PIU" vicious cycle is essential for fostering better mental health and well-being within this professional group.

Indexed as

Internet Addiction DisorderInternet UsePsychological DistressSchool TeachersAdultChinaFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyChinaDepressionLanguage teacherProblematic internet usePsychological distressStress

Identifiers

PMID40718774
PMCPMC12296581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.