ArticlePeerJ2025
Preoperative digital 6-minute walk test reveals risk of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing heart valve surgery: a pilot feasibility study.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a significant concern in cardiac surgery, affecting patient prognosis. This pilot study explored the feasibility of developing a machine learning model for preoperative PPCs risk stratification by integrating dynamic respiratory physiology from the six-minute walk test (6MWT) with clinical parameters. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from August 2021 to December 2022. We enrolled 142 consecutive patients undergoing valvular heart surgery. After quality control, 117 patients with complete synchronized respiratory monitoring during 6MWT and clinical data were included. We extracted 94 physiological features across 6MWT phases (baseline, walking, recovery) and clinical variables, developing predictive models using five machine learning algorithms evaluated through rigorous five-fold cross-validation. Results: The logistic regression model demonstrated promising discriminative performance (AUC 0.86, 95% CI [0.81-0.89]) in this exploratory cohort. Preliminary physiological patterns emerged, including associations between elevated expiratory tidal volume during recovery (OR 9.70, Conclusion: These pilot findings suggest that continuous physiological monitoring during 6MWT, when combined with clinical data, may provide a feasible approach for preoperative PPCs risk assessment. While requiring multi-center validation, the results highlight the potential of wearable-enabled respiratory monitoring to guide prehabilitation strategies in cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.