Articlei-Perception
Perceiving gloss through transparency.
Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Analysis of the Effects of Image Lightness and Chroma Modulation on the Reproduction of Glossiness, Transparency and Roughness.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The image intensity depends on the illumination, the reflectance properties of objects but also on the reflectance and absorption properties of any intervening media. In this study we present observers with glossy objects behind partially transmissive materials. The transparent layer causes an achromatic color shift and compression in luminance contrast, which can affect the perception of the specular reflections of the object behind the layer. In two distinct experiments, we examine how an achromatic color shift and the compression of luminance contrast affect perceived gloss. Thanks to the maximum likelihood conjoint measurement paradigm, we estimate the contamination of different transparent layers on perceived gloss. In the follow-up experiment, observers were asked to match the albedo and the gloss of surfaces seen in plain view to surfaces seen behind a transparent layer. Our results indicate a high degree of gloss constancy with some small but significant contribution of the transparent layer when estimating gloss, especially in the case of light-colored transparent layers. Overall, gloss is significantly overestimated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.