Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718726›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Development of the Intersectoral Care Reported by Patients Survey for Primary and Oral Healthcare.

Kirsten P J Smits, Marieke M van der Zande, Reanne Hek, Pim W J J Assendelft, Fred R Rozema, Kenneth R Wright, Maria C Dolce, Christine A Riedy, Jane R Barrow, Fabian Hüttig and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kirsten P J SmitsDepartment of Quality and Safety of Oral Health Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4327-1997
Marieke M van der ZandeDepartment of Public Health, Policy & Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6117-6531
Reanne HekDepartment of Quality and Safety of Oral Health Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Pim W J J AssendelftDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2966-3778
Fred R RozemaDepartment of Oral Medicine, Academic Center for Dentistry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kenneth R WrightDental Care Services, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest, Portland, OR, United States.
Maria C DolceDepartment of Comprehensive Care, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Christine A RiedyOral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Jane R BarrowOral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1899-9898
Fabian HüttigDepartment of Prosthodontics, Centre of Dentistry, Oral Medicine, and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7253-5923
Stefan ListlDepartment of Quality and Safety of Oral Health Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8176-3397

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Oral and general health are closely related, and many oral and chronic-systemic diseases have the same risk factors. However, in most countries dental and general health care systems are separated. Integration of care for patients with closely related, multiple conditions is therefore important to ensure they receive the best quality of care. We aimed to develop a short and easy-to-understand survey to be used by patients to assess integration of dental and primary health care through their perceptions. Methods: This study used both qualitative and quantitative methods. A modified online Delphi method was used for development of the survey. A panel consisting of seven experts assessed the survey in three rounds. The experts were based in the United States, Germany and the Netherlands and had different professional backgrounds, including general practice and dentistry. The initial framework and set of proposed questions were based on a previous survey with a similar focus. During two discussion rounds and one online round the framework and the questions were assessed and modified by the experts. The survey was then assessed for understandability among 18 patients and thereafter piloted among 199 patients. Results: The final questionnaire derived from the consensus procedure contains thirteen questions which address the following five domains: patients' wishes, expectations, awareness and concerns regarding communication between health care providers; patients' perception of health care providers' knowledge; health care provider-patient communication about health status; utilization of health care; and self-rated health. The consensus procedure also yielded improvements in the understandability of survey items: one survey item was changed from a multiple-choice question into a yes/no question, answer options were added to three other survey items, four survey items were slightly changed in wording, and five items remained unchanged. Conclusion: We developed the short, easy-to-understand Integrated Care Reported by Patients Survey to assess integration of dental and primary health care as perceived by patients. In the future, the developed survey is intended to be tested for validity and translated to other languages. The survey provides opportunities for usage in research and as a tool in quality improvement and feedback systems for health care providers.

Indexed as

dental caredoctor-patient communicationintersectoral carepatient perceptionsprimary health carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40718726
PMCPMC12292054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.