ReviewJournal of pain research2025
Addressing Pain in Oral Mucositis: Narrative Review of Current Practices and Emerging Treatments.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment Approaches for Therapy-Associated Mucosal Lesions in Pediatric Oncohematology Patients: Findings from a Retrospective Observational Study in an Italian Pediatric Hospital.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Ultrasound glossopharyngeal block for oropharyngeal pain management in cancer patients].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Observational
- Xylitol, Mitochondrial Plasticity, the Warburg Effect, and Oral Pathobiont-Associated Immune Evasion in Cancer Hypothesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Differential and Combined Therapeutic Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Glutathione on Methotrexate-Induced Mucositis.Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2026Article
- Radiotherapy-Associated Pain in Head and Neck Cancer: From Clinical Burden to Neuroimmune Modulator.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cytokine Toxicity and Bacterial Dysbiosis in Chemotherapy- and/or Radiotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Interventions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Radiation-induced oral side effects in head and neck cancer: a scoping review and interdisciplinary recommendations.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evidence-based nursing strategies for the prevention and management of oral mucositis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Staged multidisciplinary nursing management of grade 4 oral mucositis after pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Immunonutrients for radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer: current evidence and future perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Risk Factors for Oropharyngeal, Esophageal, and Oral Candidiasis in HIV-Positive Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Oral mucositis (OM) is a debilitating complication of cancer therapies, affecting up to 85% of patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation and nearly all receiving head and neck radiotherapy. Characterized by mucosal inflammation, ulceration, and severe pain, OM significantly impairs oral intake, speech, and quality of life. These disruptions, compounded by complications such as infection, bleeding, and increased healthcare costs, often necessitate treatment delays or modifications, negatively impacting cancer prognosis. Recent insights into nociceptive and neuropathic mechanisms of OM-related pain have led to the development of innovative management strategies. Given the debilitating nature of OM in cancer patients and the critical need for effective pain control, this review aims to examine pharmacological advancements targeting the complex nature of OM-related pain, including agents such as lidocaine, doxepin, benzydamine, methylene blue, opioids, gabapentin, palifermin, caphosol, and ketamine. Methods: A literature search was conducted in the PUBMED, COCHRANE, and MEDLINE databases, covering studies from 2000 to 2024. Studies focusing on OM pathogenesis and pain management strategies were screened. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews involving adult patients treated with lidocaine, doxepin, benzydamine, methylene blue, opioids, gabapentin, palifermin, caphosol, or ketamine for OM-associated pain. Conclusion: OM pain arises from nociceptive and neuropathic pathways involving inflammatory cytokines and neuropeptides. Current interventions, including topical and systemic agents, have shown promise, yet variability in treatment protocols and limited high-quality evidence hinder standardized practices. This review highlights the clinical applicability of emerging therapies, such as avasopasem manganese, which has demonstrated efficacy in mitigating OM progression. Ongoing clinical trials targeting novel pathways that modulate mucosal inflammatory response and limit disease severity offer hope for improved pain relief. Addressing the multifaceted nature of OM-associated pain is essential for enhancing quality of life and optimizing cancer treatment outcomes. Further research is needed to establish robust, evidence-based guidelines for OM pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.