ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patients with Acute Neck Pain Undergoing Conservative Treatment with Korean Medicine.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analgesic efficacy of blocking nerve to vastus lateralis muscle versus lateral femoral cutaneous nerve after knee surgeries: a randomized trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Neck proprioception and mobility improved after upper neck and spine treatment: a randomized controlled trial.Experimental brain research · 2026Trial
- Does the Type of Electrotherapy Impact the Effectiveness of Complex Physiotherapy Administered to Individuals with Neck Pain?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and safety of motion style acupuncture treatment for acute neck pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Chinese medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for patients with acute neck pain undergoing conservative treatment. Patients and Methods: This secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigated 128 individuals with acute neck pain receiving conservative treatment. The MCID and SCB of pain, functional disability, and quality of life were assessed using anchor-based methods. Patients' global impression of changes at week 9 was used as the anchor. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed, and the Youden index was employed to determine the optimal cut-off point. Area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated to assess accuracy. Minimal detectable changes (MDCs) were estimated using a distribution-based approach. Results: The study cohort comprised 60.2% female patients with an average age of 40.7 ± 12.7 years. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain during movement at baseline was 64.5 ± 10.6. The outcome measures' estimated MCID values (AUC) were as follows: VAS for pain during movement, -19.9 (0.89) and at rest, -17.5 (0.83); Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire score, -14.7 (0.78); neck disability index, -10.6 (0.77); and physical component summary (PCS), 2.0 (0.83). The SCB estimates indicated thresholds of outcome improvement to be 1.5-3-fold higher. The MDC for PCS (9.49) exceeded its MCID and SCB. Conclusion: This study provides estimates for multidimensional MCID and SCB in acute neck pain treated conservatively. These values may assist clinicians in interpreting outcomes and setting meaningful treatment goals in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.