ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025
A systematic review of vedolizumab in treating pediatric ulcerative colitis: efficacy and safety insights.
Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis: a real-world retrospective cohort study over 2 years.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) in pediatric patients often results in corticosteroid (CS) dependency, with many individuals developing resistance to conventional treatments such as anti-TNF agents. Vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting α4β7 integrin, has shown promise in adult populations, but data on its efficacy and safety in children and adolescents are limited. Objectives: This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in treating UC in pediatric patients. Design data sources and methods: The PRISMA statement's guidelines were followed in conducting this systematic review. Up until December 2024, a thorough search was carried out using keywords associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), vedolizumab, and pediatric populations in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed. Case series of children and adolescents (less than 18 years old) with UC or unclassified IBD who were treated with vedolizumab were included in the research. Data on clinical response, mucosal healing, corticosteroid-free remission, clinical remission, and adverse events were extracted. Descriptive statistics were used in the statistical analysis. Results: A total of 14 papers were considered in the current evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab. Nearly one-third (36%) of patients with UC/IBD-U experienced clinical remission at 6 weeks, half of the patients at 14 weeks (50%), and 48% and 53% of patients at 22 weeks, respectively. Forty-five percent of patients maintained clinical remission after 1 year. Less than 8% of UC/IBD-U patients experienced serious side effects, while 15%-34% of patients experienced mucosal healing. Conclusion: Vedolizumab exhibits promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in treating pediatric UC, with a sizable portion of patients achieving both clinical and corticosteroid-free remission. However, due to the limited sample sizes and lack of investigations, more randomized controlled trials and long-term research are needed to confirm these findings and develop more reliable clinical guidelines for its use in children and adolescents with UC. This means that even if the initial findings are promising, additional and better testing is required to ensure that vedolizumab is both effective and safe for young patients with UC. Trial registration: The PROSPERO registration number for this systematic review is CRD420250651513.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.