ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2025
Acceptance and implementation of evidence-based practices in delivery room resuscitation: A qualitative study.
Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Variation in Stabilization and Resuscitation Practices at Birth of Preterm Infants Among 12 National or Regional Neonatal Networks.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Variation persists in the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for delivery room resuscitation associated with high-quality care. To date, research has often studied leaders and rarely focused on the perspectives of delivery room resuscitation team members. We investigated team member perspectives on facilitators and barriers to accepting and implementing EBPs in delivery room resuscitation. Methods: This is a qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended questions in a twice-administered survey of delivery room resuscitation team members from a 16-hospital network. We conducted a two-phase content analysis, I) inductive conventional content analysis and II) deductive directed content analysis, to map response themes onto the three elements of the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework - evidence, facilitation, and context. Results: There were 569 responses from 322 individuals representing all delivery room resuscitation team member roles. We identified five main themes that influence acceptance and implementation of EBPs: evidence, education, process characteristics, leadership, and change mindset. These themes aligned with the PARIHS framework elements of Evidence, Facilitation (occurring through education and process characteristics), and Context (determined by leadership and change mindset). We identified 12 sub-themes; 9 applied to both acceptance and implementation of EBPs, 1 applied only to acceptance of EBPs, and 2 applied only to implementation of EBPs. Conclusions: While many facilitators and barriers are consistent for both acceptance and implementation, some differ. To optimize EBPs in delivery room resuscitation, organizations may benefit from tailoring interventions to incorporate facilitators and address barriers that influence EBP acceptance and/or implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.