ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Deep learning volumetrics reveal distinct clinical trajectories for pediatric low-grade gliomas under surveillance: A multicenter study.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving Pre-trained Adult Glioma Segmentation Models using only Post-processing Techniques.Segmentation, classification, and synthesis for brain tumors and traumatic brain injuries : MICCAI 2025 Challenges: BraTS-Lighthouse 2025 and AIMS-TBI 2025, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2025, Daejeon, South Korea, September 23, 2025,... · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric low-grade gliomas ( Methods: We conducted a pooled, retrospective study of radiographically diagnosed pLGG patients from two institutions diagnosed between 1992 and 2020 who were surveilled for at least 1 year post-diagnosis. Tumor segmentation was applied to longitudinal T2-weighted MR to calculate 3D tumor volumes. We assessed volume trajectories, disease progression, and associated risk factors using Cox-Hazards regression, survival analysis, and time-series forecasting with autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA). Patients were categorized based on volumetric changes into progression (≥25%), regression (≤-25%), or stability. Results: Of 99 patients (970 scans; median follow-up: 7.0 years; median diagnosis age: 12.0 years), 55 (55.5%) had tumors that volumetrically progressed, 28 (28.3%) remained stable, and 16 (16.2%) regressed. 42 (42.4%) patients initiated treatment. Risk factors associated with progression included infancy/preschool age, cortical location, and female sex (p ≤ 0.05 for each). Most progressions occurred within five years of diagnosis (80.0%), most commonly in school-aged children (7-13 years old). Time-series forecasting predicted future tumor volume with a mean absolute error of 2.04 cm Conclusion: Deep learning enables systematic, longitudinal, pLGG growth tracking and characterization of patients on surveillance, yielding insights into untreated tumor trajectories and progression risk. This pipeline is useful at population-level to study growth trends and at patient-level to guide personalized management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.