Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718648›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Deep learning volumetrics reveal distinct clinical trajectories for pediatric low-grade gliomas under surveillance: A multicenter study.

Juan Carlos Climent Pardo, Anna Zapaishchykova, Aidan Boyd, Divyanshu Tak, John Zielke, Maryam Mahootiha, Zezhong Ye, Sridhar Vajapeyam, Jacquelyn Jones, Ceilidh Smith and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Improving Pre-trained Adult Glioma Segmentation Models using only Post-processing Techniques.Segmentation, classification, and synthesis for brain tumors and traumatic brain injuries : MICCAI 2025 Challenges: BraTS-Lighthouse 2025 and AIMS-TBI 2025, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2025, Daejeon, South Korea, September 23, 2025,... · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Juan Carlos Climent PardoChair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures (CAMP), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9110-2043
Anna ZapaishchykovaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Aidan BoydDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Divyanshu TakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
John ZielkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Maryam MahootihaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Zezhong YeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Sridhar VajapeyamBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Jacquelyn JonesDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
Ceilidh SmithBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Ariana M FamiliarChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Ali NabavizadehChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0380-4552
Pratiti BandopadhayayBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4175-4760
Sabine MuellerDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Hugo J W L AertsRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, CARIM & GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Daphne A Haas-KoganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2378-4800
Franziska MichorDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
Keith L LigonDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7733-600X
Tina Y PoussaintBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Shahrooz FaghihroohiChair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures (CAMP), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Benjamin H KannDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4313-2754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pediatric low-grade gliomas ( Methods: We conducted a pooled, retrospective study of radiographically diagnosed pLGG patients from two institutions diagnosed between 1992 and 2020 who were surveilled for at least 1 year post-diagnosis. Tumor segmentation was applied to longitudinal T2-weighted MR to calculate 3D tumor volumes. We assessed volume trajectories, disease progression, and associated risk factors using Cox-Hazards regression, survival analysis, and time-series forecasting with autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA). Patients were categorized based on volumetric changes into progression (≥25%), regression (≤-25%), or stability. Results: Of 99 patients (970 scans; median follow-up: 7.0 years; median diagnosis age: 12.0 years), 55 (55.5%) had tumors that volumetrically progressed, 28 (28.3%) remained stable, and 16 (16.2%) regressed. 42 (42.4%) patients initiated treatment. Risk factors associated with progression included infancy/preschool age, cortical location, and female sex (p ≤ 0.05 for each). Most progressions occurred within five years of diagnosis (80.0%), most commonly in school-aged children (7-13 years old). Time-series forecasting predicted future tumor volume with a mean absolute error of 2.04 cm Conclusion: Deep learning enables systematic, longitudinal, pLGG growth tracking and characterization of patients on surveillance, yielding insights into untreated tumor trajectories and progression risk. This pipeline is useful at population-level to study growth trends and at patient-level to guide personalized management.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencelongitudinal analysisnatural historypediatric low-grade gliomaprogression prediction

Identifiers

PMID40718648
PMCPMC12290452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.