ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2025
Durvalumab consolidation after chemoradiotherapy for locoregional recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locoregional recurrence is one of the main failure patterns following curative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although an optimal treatment strategy for patients with locoregional recurrence has not yet been established, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is widely used in clinical practice. Treatment with CRT followed by durvalumab, a programmed death ligand 1 inhibitor, has become the standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced NSCLC. However, the efficacy of durvalumab consolidation therapy for locoregional recurrent NSCLC remains unclear. Therefore, patients with NSCLC treated with CRT at the Kyoto University Hospital (Kyoto, Japan) between January 2010 and December 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. The efficacy and safety of durvalumab consolidation between patients with locoregionally recurrent and locally advanced NSCLC who received treatment and those who did not were compared. Among 198 patients with NSCLC treated with CRT, 43 had a locoregional recurrence and 12 received durvalumab consolidation. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the durvalumab group and was 13.6 months in the non-durvalumab group [hazard ratio (HR), 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-1.71; P=0.42). The 12-, 18-, and 24-month PFS rates in the durvalumab group were 58.3, 58.3, and 50.0%, respectively. Pneumonitis was more frequent in the durvalumab group; however, no grade 3 or higher cases were observed. In conclusion, durvalumab consolidation after CRT for locoregional recurrent NSCLC demonstrated favorable efficacy and acceptable toxicity compared with treatment without durvalumab. Similar to patients with locally advanced NSCLC, those with locoregionally recurrent NSCLC may benefit from durvalumab consolidation therapy after CRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.