ArticleEuroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology
Early vs Conventional Oral Feeding after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) have shown promising results. In all previous studies on ERAS following PD; the earliest oral feeding (liquids only) was started on the first postoperative day; our objective was to start oral (liquid and soft) feed at 6 hours of surgery and assess its effect on postoperative outcome. Materials and methods: All 26 patients (Group-I) undergoing PD from November 2021 to June 2022 were prospectively enrolled and subjected to early oral feeding (EOF), i.e., oral feed at 6 hours. They were compared with a retrospective cohort (Group-II) of 40 patients who received conventional oral feeding (COF) i.e., by feeding jejunostomy on day 1. Results: Age, intraoperative blood loss, and operative time were comparable. Time to start oral liquid (0 vs 1.5 ± 1.2 days, Conclusion: Early oral feeding after PD is feasible, safe, and reduces hospital stay. How to cite this article: Sharma A, Mahla VK, Nagar A,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.