Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718558›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The effect of social grooming via live photo-sharing on well-being: the mediating role of social capital and moderating role of the need for privacy.

Fei Wang, Xin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fei WangSchool of Journalism and Communication, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China.
Xin WangSchool of Journalism and Communication, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital citizens in the social media era can share various types of photos. Live photo features on closed platforms, such as WeChat Moments, offer users a vivid sense of presence. However, the spontaneous nature of live photos may unintentionally reveal audio or visual details, raising privacy concerns. Previous research has not fully explored why users share live photos despite these risks, nor how live photo sharing affects users' well-being from a social grooming perspective. Methods: We surveyed 266 users of WeChat Moments and analyzed the data using a moderated mediation model. Social capital was tested as a mediator between live photo-based social grooming and well-being, with the need for privacy as a moderator. Results: Social grooming through live photo sharing was positively associated with users' well-being, and this association was mediated by social capital. Additionally, the strength of this positive association varied depending on users' need for privacy. Specifically, a higher need for privacy was associated with a weaker relationship between social grooming and well-being, indicating that privacy concerns might constrain the potential benefits of social grooming. Conclusion: Social grooming via live photo sharing is associated with enhanced well-being through social capital, but the strength of this association depends on users' need for privacy. To better balance social grooming and privacy protection, platforms and users should consider adopting flexible, user-controlled visibility settings.

Indexed as

live photosneed for privacysocial capitalsocial groomingwell-being

Identifiers

PMID40718558
PMCPMC12289657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.