ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
New algorithm for management of multiligament knee injuries: A tertiary level trauma center experience.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative stiffness requiring fibroarthrolysis does not impair long-term outcomes after multiligament knee reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- New algorithm for management of multiligament knee injuries: A tertiary level trauma center experience.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are severe orthopedic traumas frequently associated with concomitant structural damage, often leading to significant long-term morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of return to work (RTW) following the management of MLKIs using a standardized treatment algorithm. Methods: This prospective interventional study included patients with MLKIs who presented to a tertiary trauma center between 2019 and 2022. A total of 32 patients (30 males and 2 females) were enrolled and classified according to the Schenck classification system. The median age at the time of injury was 31 years (range: 17-60 years). The mechanism of injury was high-energy trauma in 21 patients, sports-related trauma in eight patients, and low-energy trauma in three patients. Clinical outcomes were assessed at final follow-up using the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, and return to work status. Results: At a mean 2-year postoperative follow-up, the average range of motion across all patients was 134.2° ± 16.6°. The mean postoperative Lysholm, IKDC, and UCLA scores were 86.4 ± 12.6, 65.9 ± 9.7, and 6.9 ± 2.2, respectively. Notably, 90.6% of the patients achieved a successful return to their previous work. The proportion of patients returning to work was significantly higher in the Knee Dislocation Injury (KDI) group compared to the other three Schenck classification groups, which showed no significant difference among themselves. Radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (OA) was observed in four cases (12.5%). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that satisfactory to excellent short-term clinical outcomes, including a high rate of return to work, can be achieved following ligament reconstruction for multiligament knee injuries when utilizing a standardized treatment algorithm. However, the potential for long-term complications, such as the development of knee osteoarthritis, warrants careful consideration and continued monitoring. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.