ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Exploring Mexican psychotherapist's attitudes towards knowledge and use of serious games in clinical practice.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental Health Professionals' Views on Gaming to Inform Game-Based Interventions: Qualitative Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the perceptions, attitudes, and use of serious games (SG) in psychotherapeutic intervention from the perspective of psychotherapists in Mexico. Methods: An online survey was conducted using snowball sampling through social media. The participation of psychotherapists was sought, regardless of their theoretical approach. The questionnaire, available through SurveyMonkey, explored demographics, experience with electronic devices and computer games, experience with SG, and attitudes toward SG use. Two hundred and sixteen health professionals participated, yielding 135 (62.5%) complete questionnaires; 74.1% of the respondents were women. Participants had an average age of 35 (SD + 11) and 9.5 (SD + 8.5) years of clinical experience. The most common psychotherapeutic approach was cognitive-behavioral (66.7%). Results: Nearly all respondents used a technological modality as part of psychotherapy but only nine (6.6%) reported using SG. Participants considered that SG could be used to treat anxiety and emotional and impulse control disorders with a mild to moderate degree of severity. A total of 4.8% of therapists showed unfavorable attitudes and 9.8% highly favorable attitudes towards SG; no statistically significant differences were observed by sex, age, years of experience, or psychotherapeutic approach. Although SG are a little-known care modality in Mexico, some potential benefits have been acknowledged, particularly in the care of adolescents and young people, for specific skills training. More information on their advantages and disadvantages should be made available to those seeking care and health professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.