Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718498›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025

Removal of subretinal strands without creating an intentional retinal hole: A case report.

Sonoko Sakata, Yoshihito Sakanishi, Kenji Inoue, Nobuyuki Ebihara

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonoko SakataJuntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka Urayasu-shi, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan.
Yoshihito SakanishiJuntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka Urayasu-shi, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan.
Kenji InoueInouye Eye Hospital, 4-3 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-0062, Japan.
Nobuyuki EbiharaJuntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka Urayasu-shi, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is a severe vitreoretinal disease. In cases of PVR with subretinal strands (SRS), creating an intentional retinal hole is typically necessary for removing SRS during vitrectomy. Herein, we describe a novel surgical approach for managing total retinal detachment (RD) with SRS. Case report: A 59-year-old man presented with vision loss in the right eye persisting for four years before the initial presentation. Visual acuity was limited to light perception. The right eye had a mature cataract, and ultrasound computed tomography indicated total retinal detachment. Consequently, combined cataract surgery and vitrectomy were performed on the right eye. After cataract surgery, vitrectomy was performed using a 27-gauge, four-port system. SRS were identified in all quadrants. A fifth port was created approximately 12 mm from the corneal limbus, facilitating the removal of SRS without an intentional retinal hole. Almost all the SRS were successfully removed through this port using vitreous forceps. Postoperatively, the fundus remained stable without complications such as choroidal hemorrhage. No retinal re-detachment was observed during 13 months of follow-up. Conclusion: The subretinal port provided an effective means of removing SRS without creating an intentional retinal hole in this case of total RD with SRS. This technique could be applicable to similar cases of total RD.

Indexed as

Proliferative vitreoretinopathySubretinal portSubretinal strands

Identifiers

PMID40718498
PMCPMC12296531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.