ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Leveraging the integration of bioinformatics and machine learning to uncover common biomarkers and molecular pathways underlying diabetes and nephrolithiasis.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Kidney stones are a common benign condition of the urinary system, characterized by high incidence and recurrence rates. Our previous studies revealed an increased prevalence of kidney stones among diabetic patients, suggesting potential underlying mechanisms linking these two conditions. This study aims to identify key genes, pathways, and immune cells that may connect diabetes and kidney stones. Methods: We conducted bulk transcriptome differential analysis using our sequencing data, in conjunction with the AS dataset (GSE231569). After eliminating batch effects, we performed differential expression analysis and applied weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to investigate associations with 18 forms of cell death. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were subsequently analyzed using 10 commonly used machine learning algorithms, generating 101 unique combinations to identify the final DEGs. Functional enrichment analysis was performed, alongside the construction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and transcription factor (TF)-gene interaction networks. Results: For the first time, bioinformatics tools were utilized to investigate the close genetic relationship between diabetes and kidney stones. Among 101 machine learning models, S100A4, ARPC1B, and CEBPD were identified as the most significant interacting genes linking diabetes and kidney stones. The diagnostic potential of these biomarkers was validated in both training and test datasets. Conclusion: We identified three biomarkers-S100A4, ARPC1B, and CEBPD-that may play critical roles in the shared pathogenesis of diabetes and kidney stones. These findings open new avenues for the diagnosis and treatment of these comorbid conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.