ArticleBrain and neuroscience advances
Effects of screen-based task learning and geographical environment on the cognitive performance of primary school students: Assessment of working memory.
Article in Brain and neuroscience advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the neurocognitive impact of digital integration in education is essential, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where socio-economic and geographical disparities amplify the need for effective learning strategies. This study investigated how visuospatial working memory performance is affected by the modality of task presentation (screen versus print) and geographical context (urban, economically advantaged region versus rural, economically disadvantaged region) in Ivorian primary school students. We employed a behavioural approach with 222 students (aged 4-13). Students from urban (Abidjan) and rural (Man) schools were assigned to perform a visuospatial working memory task presented either on a computer screen or using printed physical materials. An analysis of covariance, with age as a covariate, revealed that students performing the task on-screen showed significantly better performance (fewer errors) compared to those using printed materials (p < 0.001). A significant interaction between presentation modality and geographical context was also found (p = 0.009). Specifically, the performance difference between screen and print modalities was larger in the urban setting, primarily due to urban students performing more poorly with printed materials compared to rural students in that same condition; rural students using printed materials outperformed urban students using printed materials (post hoc, p = 0.002). No significant difference in performance on screen-based tasks was found between urban and rural students. The main effect of geographical context was not significant. These findings suggest potential cognitive benefits of screen-based presentation but highlight a complex interplay with geographical context, which itself is intertwined with socio-economic factors and initial age differences that were statistically controlled. Future research should further incorporate direct socio-economic status controls and explore factors like motivation and task engagement, alongside neuroimaging approaches, to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.