ArticleIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of Novel Chimeric M-PEX12 Peptide Against
Article in Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiofilm activity of a chionodracine-derived peptide by NMR-based metabolomics of cell-free supernatant of Acinetobacter baumannii clinical strains.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
- Treating Extensively Drug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Objectives: We recently designed a novel hybrid peptide, M-PEX12, which exhibits antimicrobial activity and low toxicity in vitro. To confirm its therapeutic potential, we evaluated it in both in vitro and in vivo settings. Methods: M-PEX12 was evaluated using time-kill kinetics, thermal stability, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, biofilm inhibition assays, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), cytotoxicity tests, and virulence gene expression analysis. Its in vivo activity against Results: The time-kill kinetics assay indicated that exposure to M-PEX12 at 1x minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (33/154) and 2x MIC resulted in over 95% reduction in bacterial populations within 30 minutes. Notably, the bacteria did not develop resistance to increased temperatures. M-PEX12 effectively disrupted biofilm formation at various concentrations. Field emission SEM revealed significant ultrastructural deformities in Conclusions: M-PEX12 exhibited significant antimicrobial activity and low toxicity in a mouse model, suggesting its potential as a treatment for drug-resistant bacterial infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.