ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Global research trends in surgical management of choledochal cysts: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2024.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Choledochal cysts (CCs), which are congenital biliary anomalies prevalent in Asia, predominantly affect children and carry the risk of severe complications, including malignancy. Surgical intervention, evolving from open to minimally invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) techniques, remains the cornerstone of management. Despite growing research, no bibliometric analysis has mapped the global trends in CCs surgical studies. The aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze the advances in the surgical treatment of CCs since the 21st century and to predict future research directions. Methods: Using the Web of Science Core Collection (2000-2024), we analyzed 1,064 publications on CCs surgery via Bibliometrix and CiteSpace. The search terms included surgical techniques (e.g., "laparoscop*," "Roux-en-Y") and disease terms (e.g., "choledochal cyst*"). The data encompassed authorship, citations, institutions, and keywords. Results: Average Annual publications increased by 5.95%, peaking by 2023 ( Conclusion: Surging research on CCs surgery highlights evolving priorities: bibliometrics reveal a growing focus on long-term outcomes and minimally invasive techniques (laparoscopic/robotic). Enhanced preoperative and postoperative management and novel diagnostic methods are critical. Global collaboration and standardized training remain pivotal for optimizing patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.