Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718398›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025

Time-frequency machine learning transfer function for central pressure waveforms.

Soha Niroumandi, Heng Wei, Faisal Amlani, Hossein Gorji, Rashid Alavi, Julio A Chirinos, Niema M Pahlevan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Assessment of Myocardial Injury Size Metrics Using Carotid Pressure Waveform: Proof-of-Concept in Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Rat Model.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Soha NiroumandiDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, 3650 McClintock Ave. Room 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6940-3698
Heng WeiDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, 3650 McClintock Ave. Room 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3575-7420
Faisal AmlaniUniversité Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, ENS Paris-Saclay, CNRS, LMPS-Laboratoire de Mécanique Paris-Saclay, 4 Av. des Sciences, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-8088
Hossein GorjiSwiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA), Ueberlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9089-4188
Rashid AlaviDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, 3650 McClintock Ave. Room 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1179-7089
Julio A ChirinosDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd., Smilow TRC 11th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9035-5670
Niema M PahlevanDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, 3650 McClintock Ave. Room 400, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-0396

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201500001CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201500001I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Clinical studies show that pulsatile haemodynamics and pressure waveform analysis are valuable for the diagnosis and prognosis of hypertension and heart failure (HF). While generalized transfer functions (GTFs) have shown clinical significance, some studies report limitations with GTF in capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics. This study introduces a hybrid time-frequency, machine learning-based transfer function that reconstructs central pressure waveforms from peripheral measurements, accurately capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics and arterial wave-based information. Methods and results: Our method uses Fourier harmonics for approximating the pressure waveform. The model is trained on these harmonics using a feed-forward neural network (FNN) with a custom time-domain cost function that captures the full temporal dynamics of physiological events during a cardiac cycle. The final hybridized-FNN transfer function model is trained, tested, and validated on data from the Framingham Heart Study (6698 participants). Our method produces carotid waveforms with median normalized mean squared error (%NMSE) values of 0.09 and 0.10 for brachial and radial inputs, compared to 0.42 and 0.26 for GTF, with similar accuracy improvements in other metrics. Correlation coefficients for the first and second forward wave times and amplitudes are 0.97, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.79 with brachial input, and 0.97, 0.92, 0.87, and 0.80 with radial input, vs. as low as 0.22 and 0.31 for GTF. Overall, our method significantly improved correlations across similarity, morphology, and wave-based parameters. Conclusion: Our hybridized FNN transfer function approach enables robust calculation of the central arterial pressure waveform from a single measured peripheral waveform, preserving key physiological sequences in a cardiac cycle.

Indexed as

Arterial haemodynamicsCardiovascular transfer functionCentral blood pressureTime-frequency machine learning

Identifiers

PMID40718398
PMCPMC12290398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.