Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718391›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances2025

Nuances in visual rehabilitation after pituitary surgery.

Saksham Gupta, Wenya Linda Bi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saksham GuptaCenter for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7538-6345
Wenya Linda BiCenter for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with pituitary lesions often present with visual deficits attributable to mass effect along the optic pathway or on the cranial nerves controlling extraocular muscles. While symptoms often improve after treatment, persistent symptoms negatively impact quality of life. Methods: We reviewed the literature on emerging concepts in visual monitoring and recovery during and after pituitary surgery. Results: Rigorous preoperative laboratory testing, neuro-ophthalmologic examination, and imaging abet planning of safe surgery. Intraoperative visual evoked potentials may provide an adjunct to monitor impending damage to vision during surgery, particularly for recurrent tumors that may have scarred onto visual structures. Treatment of persistent visual deficits depends on the physiological cause of the deficit, the duration of symptoms, and the degree and pace of spontaneous recovery. Management ranges from observation to corrective oculoplastic surgery, often in the context of a multidisciplinary team. There are several gaps in knowledge on the reasons why visual deficits remain after adequate decompression during surgery, and further study will reveal new therapies and devices. Conclusion: Postoperative visual deficits following pituitary surgery can cause a considerable reduction in quality of life. Multidisciplinary neurosurgery, neuro-ophthalmologic, and neuro-endocrine teams should work in concert to provide an individualized approach for each patient.

Indexed as

diplopiaoptic nerve injurypituitary surgeryvision loss

Identifiers

PMID40718391
PMCPMC12288131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.