Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718389›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances2025

Aggressive pituitary tumors and pituitary carcinomas: Definition, management, and overview for clinical practice.

Francesco Calvanese, Gianpaolo Jannelli, Loic Feuvret, Alexandre Vasiljevic, Romain Manet, Camille Sergeant, Gerald Raverot, Emmanuel Jouanneau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco CalvaneseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
Gianpaolo JannelliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland.
Loic FeuvretRadiation oncology Department, "Groupement Hospitalier Est," Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
Alexandre VasiljevicInserm U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, University Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Romain ManetSkull Base and Pituitary Unit, Department of Neurosurgery B, Neurological Hospital Pierre-Wertheimer, Bron, France.
Camille SergeantEndocrinology Department, Reference Center for Rare Pituitary Diseases HYPO, "Groupement Hospitalier Est," Hospices civils de Lyon, "Claude-Bernard" Lyon 1 University, Hôpital Louis-Pradel, Lyon, France.
Gerald RaverotEndocrinology Department, Reference Center for Rare Pituitary Diseases HYPO, "Groupement Hospitalier Est," Hospices civils de Lyon, "Claude-Bernard" Lyon 1 University, Hôpital Louis-Pradel, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-338X
Emmanuel JouanneauEndocrinology Department, Reference Center for Rare Pituitary Diseases HYPO, "Groupement Hospitalier Est," Hospices civils de Lyon, "Claude-Bernard" Lyon 1 University, Hôpital Louis-Pradel, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aggressive pituitary tumors and pituitary Carcinomas (PCs) represent very uncommon entities within the field of pituitary diseases. Unfortunately, treatment options after progression on temozolomide are limited. However, advances in the understanding of pituitary tumor genetics and their immunological landscape are paving the way for new targeted molecular therapies. Methods: In this article, we present an overview of the most recent literature, focusing on the specificities and role of current treatments and future perspectives in the management of these lesions. Results and Conclusions: Aggressive pituitary tumors and PCs remain very challenging conditions requiring a specific multidisciplinary approach in Pituitary Tumor Centers of excellence. If standard therapy fails, Temozolomide represents the first-line treatment option. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy may be also considered, especially in tumors expressing specific Somatostatin receptors. When tumors progress after Temozolomide treatment, the prognosis is typically poor, and among the various second-line treatment options immune checkpoint inhibitors have proven to be the most effective. Further studies exploring new potential targeted therapies and predictive factors for pituitary tumor aggressiveness are now essential to improve the management and outcomes for these patients.

Indexed as

adenomacarcinomaoncologyradiotherapytemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID40718389
PMCPMC12288129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.