ArticleCureus2025
Urinary Bladder Perforation: A Forensic Case Report and Brief Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary bladder ulceration and perforation are serious conditions that may develop due to various causes, most commonly trauma or complications from medical procedures. In rare instances, these conditions can occur without an identifiable cause. Bladder perforation can lead to peritonitis, a life-threatening complication with a reported mortality rate approaching 50%, primarily due to systemic inflammatory responses and multi-organ failure. Although spontaneous bladder rupture is uncommon, it has been associated with underlying conditions such as bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), malignancy, and chronic infections, or it may occur without a clearly identifiable cause (idiopathic). Prompt recognition and intervention are essential to improving patient outcomes. We present the case of a 69-year-old woman with a medical history of diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and knee osteoarthritis, for which she was receiving insulin, irbesartan, and hydrochlorothiazide. Additionally, approximately three years prior to her death, she was diagnosed with a urinary bladder neoplasm and underwent transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT), followed by intravesical therapy. Postmortem examination (PME) revealed evidence of peritonitis. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of peritonitis, along with bladder ulceration and perforation. The cause of death (COD) was determined to be peritonitis secondary to bladder perforation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.