ArticleCureus2025
Retrospective Analysis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Clinical Profile, Demographics, and Risk Factors at Sohar Hospital Over a Two-Year Period.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel. Despite its prevalence, the clinical profile, demographics, and associated risk factors vary across populations. In Oman, CTS is increasingly recognized as a significant health concern, particularly among individuals engaged in repetitive hand activities. This study aimed to analyze these aspects in a tertiary care setting in Oman over a two-year period, providing valuable insights into the burden of disease and its determinants. Materials and methods This retrospective study included 182 patients diagnosed with CTS between January 2022 and December 2023. Data on demographic variables, clinical presentations, comorbidities, occupational exposures, electrodiagnostic findings, and management outcomes were collected and analyzed. Statistical comparisons between groups were performed using chi-square tests for categorical data and logistic regression for risk factor analysis, with p-values < 0.05 considered significant. Results The mean age of the patients was 47.5 ± 10.3 years, with a predominance of females (172, 94.5%). Housewives constituted the largest occupational group (139, 76.4%), followed by nurses (12, 6.6%) and teachers (9, 4.9%). Bilateral CTS was present in 163 (89.6%) cases. Severe CTS was more prevalent in the dominant hand (128, 70.3%). Comorbidities included obesity (76, 41.8%), diabetes mellitus (41, 22.5%), and hypothyroidism (29, 15.9%). Electrodiagnostic studies revealed higher distal motor latencies and reduced sensory nerve conduction velocities in the right hand compared to the left. Surgical management achieved superior symptom resolution (41 (87.2%) versus 65 (48.1%)) (p = 0.007) and nighttime symptom relief (43 (91.5%) versus 72 (53.3%)) (p = 0.002) compared to conservative management. Diabetes (OR 9.26, p < 0.001), obesity (OR 3.98, p = 0.002), and repetitive occupational tasks (OR 5.61, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of severe CTS. Conclusions This study highlights the burden of CTS among women, particularly housewives, and underscores the impact of comorbidities and occupational exposures on disease severity. Surgical management demonstrated better outcomes than conservative approaches. Strengthening public health interventions focusing on modifiable risk factors such as obesity control and improved workplace ergonomics is recommended to reduce CTS prevalence and severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.