ReviewCureus2025
Redefining Digital Dentistry: Multidisciplinary Applications of 3D Printing for Personalized Dental Care.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Manufacturing and Periodontal Performance of CAD/CAM-Customized Orthodontic Molar Bands Compared with Standard Stainless-Steel Bands.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Mesh quality comparison of common three file formats derived from intraoral scans.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing in Dentistry: Evolution, Technologies, and Clinical Application.Polymers · 2026Review
- Dental caries beyond eradication: microbiome centered and equilibrium driven therapeutic strategies.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Concept and techniques for minimal invasive restorative dentistry: A review.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Review
- CAD/CAM-guided vascularized fibula graft for anterior maxillary reconstruction: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- 3D printing and virtual planning in maxillofacial lesion management: A retrospective study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of 3D printing into dentistry has led to a revolution in the precision and personalization of dental care. This review examines the extensive applications of 3D printing technology in various branches of dentistry. With the capability to create highly detailed, patient-specific models, devices, and appliances, 3D printing is transforming clinical workflows, enhancing the accuracy of treatments, and reducing procedural time. Moreover, it supports a digital workflow that aligns with the growing trend of personalized healthcare. Innovations in printer resolution, biocompatible materials, and printing speed continue to push the boundaries of what is possible in dental care. However, limitations related to material properties, regulatory considerations, and the need for specialized training persist. The review also highlights ongoing advancements in 3D printing technology and materials, which promise to further revolutionize dental practice. In conclusion, 3D printing holds immense potential for enhancing dental care, although overcoming existing challenges will require ongoing research and innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.