Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718259›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Understanding Hip Surgical Approaches: A Review With Clinical and Imaging Correlation.

Juan Pablo Munoz, Ignacio Espinoza, Sebastian Figueroa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan Pablo MunozSkeletal Radiology, Clinica MEDS, Santiago, CHL.
Ignacio EspinozaSkeletal Radiology, Clinica MEDS, Santiago, CHL.
Sebastian FigueroaSkeletal Radiology, Clinica MEDS, Santiago, CHL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip surgery is evolving rapidly, with an increasing diversity of techniques across arthroplasty and arthroscopy. This diversity presents challenges not only to radiologists interpreting postoperative imaging but also to general clinicians assessing surgical outcomes. A clear understanding of the various surgical approaches, their anatomical pathways, and associated complications is essential for multidisciplinary care. This review summarizes the key surgical access routes used in hip procedures, outlines their technical features, and highlights relevant postoperative findings, including potential nerve and soft tissue complications. The goal is to provide clinicians, surgeons, and imaging specialists with a unified understanding of modern hip surgical access and its implications for patient evaluation.

Indexed as

arthroplastyarthroscopyclinical correlationhip approachespostoperative imaging

Identifiers

PMID40718259
PMCPMC12291611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.