Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718207›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Finite Element Analysis of Stress and Displacement Patterns in the Maxillary Dentition During Miniscrew-Assisted en-Masse Retraction Using Variable Gable Bend Angles.

Amit Maheshwari, Rushikesh Sonwane, Veerendra Kerudi, Anama Mahevi, Jay Patil, Mahavir Kotecha, Seema Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amit MaheshwariDepartment of Orthodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation's (JMF's) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Rushikesh SonwaneDepartment of Orthodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation's (JMF's) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Veerendra KerudiDepartment of Orthodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation's (JMF's) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Anama MaheviDepartment of Orthodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation's (JMF's) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Jay PatilDepartment of Orthodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation's (JMF's) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Mahavir KotechaDepartment of Orthodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation's (JMF's) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Seema GuptaDepartment of Orthodontics, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Center, Moradabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEfficient anterior tooth retraction with simultaneous intrusion is critical for the orthodontic treatment of deep bites. Gable bends incorporated into archwires can influence the direction and magnitude of force application. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different gable bend angles (0°, 10°, 15°, and 20°) on stress distribution and displacement patterns in the maxillary dentition using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA) in the context of miniscrew-assisted en-masse retraction. METHODOLOGY: A 3D geometric model of the adult maxilla was constructed using high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan data. The maxilla was segmented using MIMICS 8.11 (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium), and surface refinement was performed using RapidForm (INUS Technology Inc., 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC). The model was meshed in HyperMesh 13.0 (Altair Engineering, Inc., Troy, MI), and analysis was performed using ANSYS 12.1 (ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA). The model included teeth from the central incisor to the second molar, with a 0.25-mm-thick periodontal ligament (PDL) and alveolar bone. Orthodontic appliances included 0.022" McLaughlin, Bennett, and Trevisi (MBT) brackets (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA) from central incisor to second premolar, bands on molars, a 0.019" x 0.025" stainless steel archwire (Ortho Organizers, Carlsbad, CA), and a transpalatal arch using 0.9 mm wire (GAC Int., Bohemia, NY). A miniscrew (1.5 mm × 10 mm; S.K. Surgicals, Pune, Maharashtra, India) was placed between the second premolar and first molar at an angle of 30°from the occlusal plane. A 200 g retraction force was applied using elastomeric chains (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI) from a 6-mm crimpable hook to the miniscrew. Four models were created with gable bend angles of 0°, 10°, 15°, and 20°, placed 2 mm away from the canine bracket. Each model contained 82,566 nodes and 392,108 elements.

resultsThe von Mises stress increased with greater gable bend angles, especially around the implant site and canine PDL. Cortical bone stress ranged from 51.9 MPa (0°) to 64.9 MPa (20°). The anterior teeth showed enhanced retraction and intrusion with 15° and 20° gable bends. The posterior teeth exhibited minimal displacement and maintained their anchorage. Intrusion and controlled tipping of the anterior teeth were more prominent at higher gable bend angles.

conclusionsGable bend angles of 15° and 20° provided optimal biomechanical conditions for en-masse retraction with effective intrusion of the maxillary anterior teeth while preserving the posterior anchorage. These configurations may offer clinical advantages for managing deep-bite cases.

Indexed as

bendsfinite element analysismaxillaorthodonticsstress

Identifiers

PMID40718207
PMCPMC12296699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.