Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718191›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Regression Modeling of ZAP-X Treatment Time.

Michael Chaga, Akil Anthony, Timothy Chen, Wenzheng Feng, Tingyu Wang, Darra Conti, Jing Feng, Ma Rhudelyn Rodrigo, Patrick Pema, Elizabeth Luick and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Michael ChagaRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Akil AnthonyGenetics and Statistics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA.
Timothy ChenRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Wenzheng FengRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Tingyu WangRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Darra ContiRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Jing FengRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Ma Rhudelyn RodrigoRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Patrick PemaNeurosurgery, Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, USA.
Elizabeth LuickRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Daniel ThompsonRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Joy BaldwinRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Brielle LatifRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Georgia MontoneRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Joseph HanleyRadiation Oncology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.
Shabbar DanishNeurosurgery, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of treatment time is critical in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for optimizing patient scheduling and workflow efficiency. The ZAP-X system (ZAP Surgical Systems, Inc., San Carlos, CA), the newest cranial SRS platform, provides a built-in estimate of treatment time but often underestimates the actual treatment duration. This study aimed to develop a robust predictive model for ZAP-X treatment time, improving accuracy and reliability. Prospective data of 200 patients treated with ZAP-X SRS at Jersey Shore University Medical Center including timing metrics, treatment planning variables, and clinical factors were analyzed. Random Forest regression identified the most critical factors influencing treatment time. Subsequently, Ridge Regression was applied to develop a predictive model, with 10-fold cross-validation used for model tuning and validation. Random Forest analysis identified setup time and gantry time as the most influential variables affecting the treatment duration, followed by the number of beams, number of isocenters, dose, and target number. The Ridge Regression model demonstrated strong predictive performance (R² = 0.984, MAE = 1.94 minutes, RMSE = 2.49 minutes), significantly surpassing the ZAP-X system's internal estimates. The model's accuracy can be attributed to its ability to account for procedural variability, particularly in setup time. The Ridge Regression model provides a highly accurate and interpretable method for predicting ZAP-X treatment time, outperforming the system's internal calculations. This model has immediate clinical utility for improving patient scheduling and resource management in SRS. Future work should focus on validating the model across institutions and adapting it to evolving ZAP-X technology.

Indexed as

regression modelingsrsstereotactic radiosurgerytreatment timezap-x

Identifiers

PMID40718191
PMCPMC12296257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.