ArticleCureus2025
Open Surgical Retrieval of a Perforated Inferior Vena Cava Filter: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are used to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) and may be associated with late-stage complications as filter hooks may deviate over time. Prolonged implantation and challenges in retrieving these filters can lead to damage to the surrounding organs. In this report, we described a case in which a thrombus in the IVC filter made retrieval difficult. Following 1.5 years of implantation, the IVC filter had perforated, necessitating surgical retrieval due to the risk of aortic injury. A 56-year-old woman presented with right lower extremity venous thrombosis and asymptomatic PE; anticoagulation therapy with edoxaban 60 mg once daily was started after the placement of an IVC filter. On the 10th day, computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed the development of venous thrombosis leading to thrombosis and occlusion of the IVC, which complicated filter retrieval. CT findings 1.5 years post-placement showed thrombus lysis and recanalization due to anticoagulation therapy with edoxaban 60 mg once daily. The patient was asymptomatic. However, filter perforation outside the IVC was observed, with one of the six perforated filter hooks located proximally to the abdominal aorta, raising concerns of potential aortic injury. Open surgical retrieval of the perforated IVC was performed under general anesthesia, with no evidence of aortic injury. The perforated hook was retrieved from outside the IVC, followed by a retrieval of the remaining filter body through venotomy. The patient's postoperative condition was stable; she was discharged without complications, and anticoagulation therapy with edoxaban 60 mg once daily was continued for six months postoperatively. IVC filter perforation is a common late complication associated with filter use. Currently, no clear consensus exists regarding these treatment strategies, and further research and case studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.