ArticleCureus2025
Food-Dependent Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis on a Nontraditional Timeline.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) is a rare but potentially severe allergic reaction that can occur upon eating a specific food followed by exercise. It is triggered by the combination of a food allergen and exercise as a cofactor. We present one of the few documented FDEIA instances with a reversed sequence of ingestion after exercise. A 14-year-old male with no history of food allergy developed anaphylaxis after ingestion of a new protein drink, shortly after strenuous activity. His symptoms included facial angioedema, pruritus, and cough. He was taken to the emergency department and treated with epinephrine, diphenhydramine, and prednisone, with rapid improvement. At follow-up, serum tryptase, C4 and C3 complement, chronic urticaria index, and C074-IgE gelatin values were normal. Skin prick testing (SPT) demonstrated sensitization to trees, grasses, and weeds. Peas, bananas, and strawberries were potentially cross-reactive ingredients in the drink, and negative on SPT. Additionally, the patient had consumed these foods in the past without experiencing a similar reaction. The patient was informed of possible FDEIA and was prescribed an epinephrine auto-injector (EpiPen). He was counseled on avoiding strenuous exercise two hours before and after ingestion of foods that have cross-reactivity to environmental aeroallergens seen on his SPT. In most FDEIA cases, symptoms typically develop after physical activity when the patient has ingested a food to which they are sensitized. Given the possibility of presentation in a reversed sequence, providers should continue to consider FDEIA as a diagnosis when the ingestion event occurs after the exercise event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.