ArticleCureus2025
Efficacy of a Novel, Self-Paced, Online Global Health Track Curriculum for Medical Residents.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction Global health education has become ubiquitous in medical training, yet many residency programs lack structured curricula. We developed a novel, self-paced, online global health curriculum designed for medical residents with limited educational support. The curriculum includes four modules covering global health theory, history, ethics, and cultural humility, supplemented by optional in-person sessions. Methods This study evaluates the effectiveness of our global health curriculum designed for medical residents at the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital Global Health Track. Pre- and post-tests, along with self-efficacy surveys, were used to assess the participants' knowledge and confidence. Results Twelve residents participated in piloting the curriculum, with the majority born outside the U.S. and over 70% having prior global health experience. Results demonstrated that there was a positive change in most pre- and post-test scores and narrower interquartile ranges for the self-efficacy scores after completing the course. Participants reported improved confidence in meeting the curriculum's objectives, and the majority stated that the modules were worth their time. Discussion The study was limited by several factors, including a small sample size and a single-site study. The self-paced, online format of the curriculum allows for flexibility and accessibility, particularly for institutions with limited funding or faculty support. This curriculum highlights an alternative option for global health training, and the course serves as a scalable model for other institutions seeking to provide global health training. Future directions for this type of curriculum include expansion to other residency programs and inclusion of other learners such as medical students or practicing health professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.