ArticleAsia Pacific allergy2025
Intensive bronchial dilation test: A modified method for evaluating airway reversibility.
Article in Asia Pacific allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A negative bronchial dilatation test (BDT) does not fully reflect the status of airway irreversibility in patients with severe obstructive or mixed ventilation dysfunction due to severe bronchospasm, mucus blockage, or insensitivity to bronchodilators, which will directly affect the subsequent diagnosis and treatment of those patients. Objective: We retrospectively examined the feasibility of using the "intensive bronchial dilation test" (IBDT) for excluding false-negative BDT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 82 patients with severe obstructive or mixed ventilation dysfunction in the Allergy department of Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University. After the BDT, they all inhaled the triple atomized drugs (2 mg salbutamol, 1 mg budesonide, and 0.25 mg ipratropium) every 20 minutes in one hour and the lung function test was performed 15 minutes later, which was named as IBDT. All patients received another lung function test after 2 to 4 weeks of regular anti-inflammatory treatment. We compared the improvement of lung function indexes and the proportion of patients with reversible airway obstruction between BDT, IBDT, and 2 to 4 weeks of treatment groups. Results: The lung function indexes were significantly improved after the IBDT than those after the BDT (all Conclusion: Our finding suggests that IBDT can more accurately and rapidly evaluate airway reversibility in patients with severe obstructive or mixed ventilation dysfunction when compared to BDT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.