ReviewCurrent research in pharmacology and drug discovery2025
Harnessing Antiviral Peptides: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.
Review in Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scorpion venom as a source of new antimicrobial agents.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Structure-Guided Design of Peptide Inhibitors Targeting Class I Viral Fusion Proteins.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viral infections continue to pose a significant threat to global health, especially with the emergence and re-emergence of resistant viral strains. The limitations of conventional antiviral therapies, such as narrow-spectrum activity, high toxicity, and rising resistance, underscore the need for innovative treatment strategies. Antiviral peptides (AVPs) have gained attention as promising therapeutic agents due to their broad-spectrum antiviral activity, low cytotoxicity, and ability to target multiple stages of the viral life cycle. This review provides a comprehensive overview of AVPs, focusing on their classification, mechanisms of action, and clinical relevance. Both natural and synthetic AVPs are discussed, including FDA-approved agents such as enfuvirtide (HIV) and boceprevir (HCV), along with candidates currently in clinical trials. AVPs inhibit viral attachment, fusion, replication, and assembly, while also modulating host immune responses. Their applications extend beyond treatment to include prophylaxis and combination therapies, offering potential benefits in pandemic preparedness. However, challenges such as enzymatic degradation, poor bioavailability, and high production costs limit their clinical translation. Recent advances in peptide engineering, computational drug design, and nanoparticle-based delivery systems aim to overcome these barriers. AVPs represent a promising class of antiviral agents with the potential to address current therapeutic gaps and improve future outbreak response. This review highlights their growing importance in the field of antiviral therapy and outlines future directions for research and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.