ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025
Perspectives on Ligament Augmentation Techniques Among AOFAS Members: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ligamentous pathologies and injuries of the foot and ankle commonly require surgical repair. Ligament augmentation techniques (LAT) use a synthetic ligament that spans the anatomic length of the injured ligament, anchoring to bone on both ends. Use of LAT in foot and ankle surgery is rapidly progressing, but the rates of usage and surgeon-specific indications are not well known. This study aims to provide an in-depth analysis of LAT use by foot and ankle surgeons. Methods: An online survey was distributed to the surgeon members of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS). Survey questions detailed demographics and practice details, current use of LATs, and the future trajectory of LATs. Responses were tabulated and summarized. Logistic regression and χ2 tests of independence compared trends in LAT use between North America and outside continent, years in practice, and type of practice. Results: Of 1895 invited surgeons, 244 (12.9%) completed the survey. Among respondents, 209 surgeons (85.7%) reported current LAT use, most of whom were based in North America (197, 80.7%). North American respondents were significantly more likely to report using LAT when compared to respondents outside of North America (89% vs 72% respectively) ( Conclusion: LAT use in foot and ankle surgery is multifactorial, influenced by patient demographics, regional practices, industry dynamics, and surgeon training. Ongoing debates about the cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes of LAT suggest that further research is necessary to fully define its role in orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.