Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718054›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2025

Is 2 h of Hypothermic Machine Perfusion for Pancreas Preservation Effective in Improving Graft Reperfusion?

Benoit Mesnard, Christophe Masset, Etohan Ogbemudia, Sarah Bruneau, Mohamed Elzawahry, Stéphanie Le Bas-Bernardet, David Minault, Jeremy Hervouet, Diego Cantarovich, Jérôme Rigaud and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Benoit MesnardDepartment of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Christophe MassetNantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN5, Nantes, France.
Etohan OgbemudiaNuffield Department of Surgical Science, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sarah BruneauNantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN5, Nantes, France.
Mohamed ElzawahryNuffield Department of Surgical Science, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stéphanie Le Bas-BernardetNantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN5, Nantes, France.
David MinaultNantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN5, Nantes, France.
Jeremy HervouetNantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN5, Nantes, France.
Diego CantarovichNantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN5, Nantes, France.
Jérôme RigaudDepartment of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Lionel BadetDepartment of Urology Surgery and Transplantation, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Peter FriendNuffield Department of Surgical Science, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rutger PloegNuffield Department of Surgical Science, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Gilles BlanchoNantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN5, Nantes, France.
James HunterNuffield Department of Surgical Science, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Thomas PrudhommeNantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN5, Nantes, France.
Julien BranchereauDepartment of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Static cold storage (SCS) remains the standard method for organ preservation. The development of parenchymal edema during prolonged hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) was a major barrier to the introduction of this technique for the preservation of pancreases. A short period of HMP could optimize the pancreas for reperfusion while minimizing the side effects related to perfusion. Our objective is to evaluate the impact of short-term HMP on the pancreatic reperfusion. Methods: A preclinical study using a controlled donation after circulatory death porcine model was conducted. After procurement, the pancreases were preserved under hypothermic conditions for 2 h either by SCS (n = 4) or HMP (n = 4). After these 2 h of preservation, the pancreases were reperfused using a normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) for 2 h. During NMP, oxygenation, perfusion parameters, biochemical analyses, a glucose stimulation insulin secretion test, and an evaluation of ischemia/reperfusion injury by photoacoustic tomography were assessed. Results: During NMP, resistance indices were significantly lower in the HMP group compared with the SCS group, even after 2 h of reperfusion. The tissue oxygen partial pressure was higher throughout NMP after HMP preservation. Lactate and amylase levels were equal between the 2 groups. Lipase levels were higher in the HMP group. The glucose stimulation test showed no difference between the 2 groups. Photoacoustic tomography assessment showed no endothelial damage in either group. Conclusions: Our study suggests that a short-term HMP applied to pancreases for 2 h is effective in reducing resistance indexes and improving oxygenation.

Identifiers

PMID40718054
PMCPMC12289133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.