Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718043›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2025

From small steps to big impact: what we learnt from the National Bowel Screening Programme.

Susan Parry, Ian Bissett, John McMenamin, Ashley Bloomfield, Mhairi Porteous, John Childs, Deborah Woodley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susan ParryNational Public Health Service, National Bowel Screening Programme, New Zealand.
Ian BissettDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
John McMenaminNational Public Health Service, National Bowel Screening Programme, New Zealand.
Ashley BloomfieldSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Mhairi PorteousNational Public Health Service, Wellington, New Zealand.
John ChildsNorthern Regional Blood and Cancer Centre, Te Whatu Ora, Radiation Oncology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Deborah WoodleyTe Whatu Ora Health, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation of the National Bowel Screening Programme for Aotearoa New Zealand has been a 26-year journey with many challenges and obstacles. This paper describes lessons learnt. Despite international evidence of efficacy from studies before the year 2000, country-specific decisions shaped by committed multidisciplinary teams were required. Before introducing bowel screening, many initiatives to improve related healthcare delivery were implemented, which often led to systemic improvements. A pilot study was needed to demonstrate that bowel screening was safe, affordable, and could be delivered equitably. Despite comprehensive plans based on the Pilot with ongoing adjustments, to date, the programme has fallen short of achieving equity for participation for Māori and Pacific peoples. The delays involved in developing the required population IT system were challenging resulting in a period where two different IT systems were being used simultaneously. This should be avoided. General Practice was involved from the outset, with an increasing role as the programme developed. Critics of progress were sometimes vocal, but input from global leaders in bowel screening helped keep the programme on track to national implementation. The programme has delivered in terms of safety and early diagnosis of cancer. Its lessons provide a foundation for future public health initiatives.

Indexed as

bowel screeningColorectal cancerfaecal immunochemical testprogramme initiationpublic health

Identifiers

PMID40718043
PMCPMC12288162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.