ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2025
Looking back and planning ahead: the tobacco endgame and controlling tobacco industry interference in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in smoking prevalence before and after the emergence of vaping in Aotearoa/New Zealand among 14-15-year-olds identifying as Māori, Pacific, European, or Asian: an interrupted time series analysis of repeated cross-sectional data, 2003-2024.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- An analysis of submissions on regulations to implement Aotearoa New Zealand's tobacco endgame policies.Health promotion international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smoking causes at least 16 different cancers and has resulted in persistent health inequities. Aotearoa New Zealand was initially a Tupeka Kore (Tobacco Free) nation and Māori leaders have led calls for measures that would end the harms smoking imposes. Their vision inspired a national movement and later saw a new law introduced that mandated denicotinisation, reduced the supply of tobacco, and introduced a smokefree generation. The National-led coalition Government repealed these measures, drawing on arguments often advanced by tobacco companies. Using the Policy Dystopia Model, we analysed tobacco industry narratives and reviewed politicians' use of industry arguments. We found coalition Government members drew on prohibition and illicit trade arguments, which segued into public safety concerns, despite weak evidence for these claims. To protect innovative public health policies, we argue for stronger lobbying regulation to reduce tobacco companies' ability to interfere with policy making and improve compliance with Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Stronger regulation of lobbying would protect critical public health policies that could profoundly reduce cancer rates from commercial interests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.