Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718037›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2025

Sun safety policy implementation in Aotearoa New Zealand: current landscape and progress.

Bronwen McNoe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bronwen McNoeDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3314-5604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer is a critical public health issue in Aotearoa New Zealand (A/NZ), with alarming incidence rates and substantial economic costs. Excessive solar ultraviolet radiation is the primary modifiable risk factor, and effective sun protection policies are crucial for prevention. This paper examines the current policy landscape for skin cancer prevention in A/NZ, focusing on educational settings, workplaces, sports organisations, and local governments. It evaluates key legislation and highlights gaps in policy implementation, such as insufficient shade provision in schools and variable adherence to sun protection protocols in workplaces and sports settings. Despite existing regulations, there is a need for stronger enforcement and comprehensive policy development. This paper also addresses the role of sun protection product standards, such as those for sunscreens, and the impact of bans on commercial sunbeds. The discussion emphasises the importance of integrating sun protection into all levels of policy and practice and advocates for enhanced support, public awareness, and uniform implementation across sectors. By addressing these gaps, more effective sun protection strategies can be developed, ultimately reducing skin cancer incidence and improving public health outcomes.

Indexed as

legislationmelanomapolicyprimary preventionregulationSkin cancer

Identifiers

PMID40718037
PMCPMC12288170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.