Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718015›Full record

ArticlePrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2025

Interstitial pregnancy - from diagnosis to treatment: case report and literature review.

Nikoleta Stoyanova, Angel Yordanov, Nikola Popovski

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nikoleta StoyanovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria.
Angel YordanovDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Medical University Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria.
Nikola PopovskiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstitial pregnancy (IP) is a rare kind of tubal pregnancy, which occurs in 2-4% of all ectopic pregnancies. It occurs as a result of implantation of the gestational sac in the proximal intramural part of the fallopian tube. Risk factors include the following: pregnancy conceived after assisted reproductive technologies, ipsilateral salpingectomy, previous ectopic pregnancy, congenital tubal and uterine malformations, pelvic inflammatory disease, and the presence of an intrauterine device. Given the rare and complex nature of interstitial pregnancies, diagnosis and management are difficult. Transvaginal ultrasound is the most specific instrumental method for early diagnosis that can decrease possible complications, such as rupture, severe haemorrhage, and risk of future infertility in the case of misdiagnosis. There are various surgical and non-surgical methods for the treatment of interstitial pregnancy. The method of choice depends on gestational age, whether the pregnancy is intact or ruptured, and the patient's desire for future fertility. However, surgery is still the main option for the treatment of IP because it offers definitive treatment. Generally, complicated IP is associated with high rate of mortality due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. We present a case report related to a multiparous woman with amenorrhoea and ultrasound findings corresponding to sonographic criteria for interstitial pregnancy. Laparoscopy was performed, which confirmed the diagnosis. Bilateral salpingectomy and right cornual resection were performed because the patient had no intention for future pregnancies.

Indexed as

cornual resectionectopic pregnancyinterstitialtreatmentultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40718015
PMCPMC12288496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.