ReviewPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2025
Minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy - the current European landscape.
Review in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Feasibility and outcomes of single-incision robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: current evidence, technical considerations, and clinical outcomes.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Endoscopy‑assisted breast‑conserving treatment: the first Polish review of 30 patients.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026Article
- Three Strategic Pillars for Implementing Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy (M-NSM), performed with endoscopic systems or with surgical robot assistance, is a novel alternative to the classic approach to nipple-sparing mastectomies. Leading advancements in M-NSM have primarily come from Asia. We gather experts' opinions from six European countries to establish the current status of M-NSM in Europe. An eight-question survey was designed to explore M-NSM's historical background and current standing in various local settings. We collected data from 6 European countries, including Italy, Spain, France, Switzerland, Belgium, and Poland. The number of centers offering M-NSM procedures in each reported country ranges 1-9. The number of procedures performed annually in four centers exceeds 10. In all reported countries, current national breast cancer recommendations do not include M-NSM, and this procedure is not explicitly covered by any of the national health care providers. All experts have indicated the need for training in M-NSM surgery as a primary way to incorporate these techniques as a standard procedure. Minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy is still a tool used by a narrow group of specialists in Europe. The main obstacle to broader implementation remains the extra cost of M-NSM, which requires reimbursement from the health care providers. Training courses, data collection, and demonstration of its benefits are the key to promoting M-NSM among breast surgeons and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.