Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717958›Full record

ReviewImmunotherapy advances2025

Going viral: targeting glioblastoma using oncolytic viruses.

Katie Coates, Robert J Nibbs, Alasdair R Fraser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunotherapy advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katie CoatesSchool of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Sir Graeme Davies Building, Glasgow G12 8TA, United Kingdom.
Robert J NibbsSchool of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Sir Graeme Davies Building, Glasgow G12 8TA, United Kingdom.
Alasdair R FraserSchool of Infection and Immunity, University of Glasgow, Sir Graeme Davies Building, Glasgow G12 8TA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7822-650X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating malignant disease with a remarkably low 5-year survival rate and invariably poor prognosis. Current conventional treatment options (surgery, targeted radiotherapy, and a limited number of chemotherapies) are rarely entirely effective, leading to the majority of GBM patients experiencing disease recurrence shortly after primary treatment. Thus far, immunotherapeutic approaches towards GBM treatment have been largely unsuccessful due to the tumour site and profoundly immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME). However oncolytic virus therapy (OVT) has been recently developed and licenced for the treatment of cancers and has the potential to switch the TME to become immune-reactive. This has been shown to both directly reduce tumour burden while also enhancing responsiveness to other therapies. In this review, we review the challenges faced by standard immunotherapies in GBM and outline the various approaches to OV treatment of GBM. We highlight the promise of OVT for targeting GBM by critically assessing the outcomes from recent clinical trials.

Indexed as

early-phase trialglioblastomaimmunomodulatoryoncolytic virotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40717958
PMCPMC12290287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.