ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Feasibility and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography for child neurodevelopmental research in rural Ethiopia.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation of mobile EEG for resting-state and visual evoked potentials in young children in rural Ethiopia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) are valuable tools for studying neuroanatomical and electrophysiological features of early brain development. Studies implementing neuroimaging tools in low- and middle-income countries are still rare, and there is limited data on the acceptability of such tools among rural communities. The present study explores the perceptions, feasibility, and acceptability of introducing MRI and EEG for child development research in the rural Amhara region of Ethiopia. Methods: A total of 40 in-depth interviews were conducted among community members ( Results: Knowledge of MRI and EEG was limited, and none of the community members had previous experiences with either technology. Broadly, participants responded positively to our introductory videos showing MRI and EEG acquisition and expressed high levels of acceptability. However, participants reported concerns about possible harms related to radiation, electrical shock, and injury from MRI/EEG procedures. Those with lesser education were identified to be less accepting of MRI/EEG. In addition, several mothers expressed that consent from their husbands was necessary for their child's participation in neurodevelopmental research. Potential logistical barriers identified included transportation challenges to the neuroimaging study sites, especially for rural-dwelling families. Creating awareness, using explanatory videos, and engaging community members and clinicians were recommended to facilitate acceptance of EEG and MRI. Conclusion: In this formative study, MRI and EEG were viewed as acceptable methods for assessing child neurodevelopment in rural areas of Ethiopia. Community members' and clinicians' views were impacted largely by social, religious, educational, and logistical aspects. Concerns related to MRI radiation, electrical shock, and injuries from EEG can be addressed through awareness creation and education. Engaging community leaders and healthcare providers is key to improving acceptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.