ReviewCureus2025
Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon: A Narrative Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary slow flow (CSF) is understood to be a clinical condition during which angiographic findings show the slowed filling of contrast in the coronary vasculature in individuals without a history of coronary artery disease (CAD). Other names for this entity include, less commonly, Syndrome Y and primary CSF. Though clinically underestimated, it is a recognized phenomenon and is documented in a subset of patients with symptoms resembling acute coronary syndrome. The most common group with CSF is that of young males with a history of smoking. CSF is clinically relevant, with patients presenting with chest pain, arrhythmias, and even sudden death. CSF therefore markedly impairs patients' quality of life. Particular treatments for CSF are not specified, though oral calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been used successfully. Much research has been done regarding CSF, and it is thought to reflect endothelial dysfunction. Factors such as inflammation, atherosclerosis, hematological disorders, and structural components may also contribute to CSF's pathology, though CSF's exact cause is still not fully understood by clinicians. CSF is also distinct from conditions with similar presentations, such as post-procedural slow flow and vasospasm. Since the importance of CSF is being understood to be clinically relevant by clinicians, research is recommended to better further elucidate the pathology of this phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.