ReviewCureus2025
Predictive Biomarkers in Cancer Immunotherapy: A Narrative Review Across Selected Solid Tumors.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Peripheral T-Cell Receptor β Repertoire Dynamics Correlate with Response to Anti-PD-L1 Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- BANF1 as a potential prognostic biomarker associated with tumor-intrinsic programs and a complex immune landscape in lung adenocarcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Predictive Biomarkers for Asymptomatic Adults: Opportunities, Risks, and Guidance for General Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Colorectal cancer liver metastasis: immunosuppressive microenvironment, signaling pathways, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- From peripheral blood to tumor microenvironment: spatial dimension deficiency and paradigm reconstruction in immunotherapy biomarker research.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Peripheral blood biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: distinguishing predictive from prognostic biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Plying potency assays for immunotherapy of solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Breast cancer pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Mapping the landscape of predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Pre-treatment endocrine-nutritional signatures predict clinical benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in hematologic malignancies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has transformed the therapeutic landscape for several malignancies, offering durable responses in select patient populations. However, response rates remain variable, underscoring the need for robust predictive and prognostic biomarkers. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on biomarkers guiding immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer. Literature was identified through manual screening of PubMed and Scopus using key terms related to immunotherapy biomarkers, with no date restrictions applied; studies published up to May 2025 were included. Clinically validated markers such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) demonstrate utility but face limitations including assay variability and tumor heterogeneity. Emerging candidates, such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), relative eosinophil count (REC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), offer additional prognostic or predictive value but require further validation. This review adds value by integrating and comparing both validated and emerging biomarkers across tumor types and by emphasizing practical considerations for real-world application. Given the narrative format and focus on selected cancers, the scope is inherently limited, and not all emerging biomarkers or real-world implementation data are fully addressed. Methodological limitations and current gaps in biomarker validation are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.