Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717870›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2025

Minimizing Instability in Isolated Head and Liner Exchange With the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Capsular-Sparing Technique.

Ricardo J Torres-Ramirez, Jose A Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ricardo J Torres-RamirezAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Department, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Jose A RodriguezAdult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Department, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dislocation is a common complication after head and liner exchange. Although surgical approach has been shown to influence instability rate following primary total hip replacement, the same has not been demonstrated for head and liner exchange. The effect of additional soft tissue release to achieve exposure in revision surgery has been implicated in this finding. We have sought to describe and report the effects on postoperative stability of a capsular sparing technique of head and liner exchange with the direct anterior approach, in a single surgeon case series. Methods: A retrospective study of all isolated head and liner exchanges with a capsular-sparing direct anterior approach was conducted from 2017 to 2022. Patients without a 2-year follow-up or prior revision on the ipsilateral hip were excluded. A total of 39 hips in 36 patients were identified, with the most common indication for HLE being, liner wear + osteolysis in 44% of patients. The mean follow-up was 29.8 months. Results: At the latest follow-up there were zero dislocations. Two patients required re-revision for acetabular component loosening, yielding a 95% survivorship free of re-revision at latest follow-up. A 36-mm head was utilized in 65% and a neutral liner in 85% percent of the hips. The average Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement score at latest follow-up was 80.81. Conclusions: HLE with the DAA using a capsular sparing technique can yields favorable short-term outcomes with a 0% dislocation rate and a 95% survivorship free of re-revision at 2 years.

Indexed as

Direct anterior approachDislocationHead and liner exchangeRevision total hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40717870
PMCPMC12296525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.