Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717855›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22025

ICD support groups: Are they still relevant now?

Samuel F Sears, Samantha McCrary, Tiffany Andrade, Lauren Rousseau, Ann Kirkness, Allana Fantin, Julie B Shea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel F SearsDepartment of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Samantha McCraryDepartment of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Tiffany AndradeBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lauren RousseauBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ann KirknessRoyal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Allana FantinAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
Julie B SheaBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) save lives in patients at risk for potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, ICD shocks may prompt fear and anxiety and cause potential psychological trauma in patients. Since the beginning of the ICD's broad use, healthcare professionals recognized the unique demands and experiences associated with this therapy. Some clinics responded by initiating patient-focused meetings broadly referred to as "ICD support groups" to address the mental health challenges in these patients. Decades of research have now underscored the importance of ICD patients' psychological and behavioral processes and their associations with adverse health outcomes. ICD patients frequently report disease-specific mental health symptoms, including ICD shock anxiety, poor device acceptance, body image concerns, and decreased physical activity, that require unique clinical expertise from professionals to effectively manage. The original impetus for ICD support groups persists, but relatively few ICD support groups remain active. Online offerings may have taken on some of these functions. We suggest that ICD support groups remain a strategic intervention to address patient psychological and lifestyle concerns. This paper reviews the value of ICD support groups in the United States, Australia, and Canada and analyzes the current state and potential value of ICD support groups.

Indexed as

Cardiac-specific distressImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorsMental healthPatient acceptanceSupport group

Identifiers

PMID40717855
PMCPMC12287944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.